O Perpetuo Mobile
, it is assumed that the creation or operation of this type of mobile / machine / appliance / Chunche is not possible, since it violates the
the 1st and the 2nd
law of thermodynamics Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Windows Movie Maker Hvor Er Billede Sort
Perpetuum Mobile
O Perpetuo Mobile
, it is assumed that the creation or operation of this type of mobile / machine / appliance / Chunche is not possible, since it violates the
the 1st and the 2nd
law of thermodynamics
, Which are among the most well-established physical laws, so in theory it would be impossible to create a device that behaves in this way. O Perpetuo Mobile
, it is assumed that the creation or operation of this type of mobile / machine / appliance / Chunche is not possible, since it violates the
the 1st and the 2nd
law of thermodynamics However ...
Thane Heins, a 46 year-old Canadian inventor has developed a machine (the fruit of 23 years of work) and the pot- soon could be classified as a machine perpetual motion.
Heins, who dropped out of college, nothing ventured to say that his invention is really a perpetual motion machine; it admits that it knows how to demonstrate the physical and theoretical performance of your machine. For this reason we approached the MIT professor
Heins, who dropped out of college, nothing ventured to say that his invention is really a perpetual motion machine; it admits that it knows how to demonstrate the physical and theoretical performance of your machine. For this reason we approached the MIT professor
Markus Zahn, an expert on electrical and electromagnetic systems.
Professor Zahn , impressed, said it is an unusual phenomenon, which he had not predicted such behavior and is worth investigating more about it, saw it's real. In the machine Heins says Zahn
Working with an electric motor, Heins, joined the motor shaft to a steel rotor with small round magnets on its inner face, with this configuration has a simple electric generator which the rotor rotates the magnets pass by in front of a coil and thereby generating electricity.
Heins did an experiment: Overburdened generator for power, this action generates an electromagnetic field around the coil. Usually
according to the Law
Lenz, 
such electromagnetic field generates a EMF (Electro Motive Force) contrary to the magnetic flux that produces it, which cause the magnets were slowing their movement and eventually stop the engine altogether. The surprise: The rotor, instead of stopping, accelerating. Magnetic friction should repel magnets deviated from the bovine through the metal rotor and the shaft to the electric motor, so that the electromotive Force now feeds the electric motor and produces an over-acceleration. And the faster the rotor spins greater electromagnetic field is produced and in fact the rotor spins faster.
It seems that
Heins was able to generate a positive cycle of "self-power" that produces more energy than it consumes. To test this theory replace a section of the metal shaft by a plastic sheet to prevent the conduction of magnetic flux, and it happened as expected, there was no acceleration. "What I can say is that we have a system that violates the law of conservation of energy" - Heins said - which named its system as
Perepiteia , which in Greek means "an action that has the opposite effect from what should have" . Will be left to others if your system can actually be labeled as Perpetual Motion Machine .
Source: Inventor Does not Dare Say 'Perpetual Motion Machine .
It seems that
Heins was able to generate a positive cycle of "self-power" that produces more energy than it consumes. To test this theory replace a section of the metal shaft by a plastic sheet to prevent the conduction of magnetic flux, and it happened as expected, there was no acceleration. "What I can say is that we have a system that violates the law of conservation of energy" - Heins said - which named its system as
Perepiteia , which in Greek means "an action that has the opposite effect from what should have" . Will be left to others if your system can actually be labeled as Perpetual Motion Machine .
Source: Inventor Does not Dare Say 'Perpetual Motion Machine .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment